Haben Sie sich jemals gefragt, welcher Reifentyp am besten zu Ihrem Pickup passt? Wir sind uns wahrscheinlich alle einig, dass MT-Reifen am coolsten aussehen, aber welche Nachteile haben Sie, wenn Sie einen M / T-Reifen montieren und dann Ihre ganze Zeit auf normalen Straßen verbringen?
In diesem Test habe ich mich mit General Tire zusammengetan, um einen HT-Straßenreifen, einen milden Geländereifen, einen aggressiven AT-Reifen und natürlich einen klobigen MT-Reifen in den Größen 265/70 R17 und LT315 / 70 R17 zu testen.
Welche Reifen eignen sich am besten für Ihre eigenen Fahrbedingungen? Sehen Sie sich das Video an, um es herauszufinden.
Alle Daten sind unten. Bitte beachten Sie, dass der Reifen "Reference Mud Terrain" der LT315 / 70 R17 GRABBER X3 ist
Trocken
Nass
Off Road
Schmutz
Kies
Schlamm
Umgebung
Ergebnisse
|
|
| Test | # | Result | Best | Difference | % |
|---|
| Trockenbremsen | 1st | 46 M | | | 100% | | Trockenhandling | 2nd | 100.98 s | 100.84 s | +0.14 s | 99.86% | | Subj. Trockenhandling | 1st | 10 Points | | | 100% | | Nassbremsen | 1st | 59.3 M | | | 100% | | Nasshandling | 1st | 82.2 s | | | 100% | | Subj. Nasshandling | 1st | 10 Points | | | 100% | | Aquaplaning geradeaus | 3rd | 89.1 Km/H | 105.1 Km/H | -16 Km/H | 84.78% | | Schotterhandling | 4th | 62.78 s | 60.92 s | +1.86 s | 97.04% | | Subj. Schotter Handling | 4th | 8 Points | 10 Points | -2 Points | 80% | | Schmutz Handling | 3rd | 53.55 s | 52.62 s | +0.93 s | 98.26% | | Subj. Schmutz Handling | 3rd | 9 Points | 10 Points | -1 Points | 90% | | Schlamm Performance | 4th | 100 % | 199 % | -99 % | 50.25% | | Subj. Komfort | 1st | 10 Points | | | 100% | | Reifengewicht | 1st | 75.2 Kg | | | 100% | | Rollwiderstand | 1st | 9 kg / t | | | 100% | Beurteilungen lesen |
|
|
| Test | # | Result | Best | Difference | % |
|---|
| Trockenbremsen | 2nd | 47.9 M | 46 M | +1.9 M | 96.03% | | Trockenhandling | 1st | 100.84 s | | | 100% | | Subj. Trockenhandling | 2nd | 9.8 Points | 10 Points | -0.2 Points | 98% | | Nassbremsen | 2nd | 64.2 M | 59.3 M | +4.9 M | 92.37% | | Nasshandling | 2nd | 85.2 s | 82.2 s | +3 s | 96.48% | | Subj. Nasshandling | 2nd | 9 Points | 10 Points | -1 Points | 90% | | Aquaplaning geradeaus | 2nd | 92.9 Km/H | 105.1 Km/H | -12.2 Km/H | 88.39% | | Schotterhandling | 3rd | 62.26 s | 60.92 s | +1.34 s | 97.85% | | Subj. Schotter Handling | 3rd | 9.2 Points | 10 Points | -0.8 Points | 92% | | Schmutz Handling | 2nd | 52.93 s | 52.62 s | +0.31 s | 99.41% | | Subj. Schmutz Handling | 2nd | 9.5 Points | 10 Points | -0.5 Points | 95% | | Schlamm Performance | 3rd | 119 % | 199 % | -80 % | 59.8% | | Subj. Komfort | 2nd | 9.8 Points | 10 Points | -0.2 Points | 98% | | Reifengewicht | 3rd | 78.2 Kg | 75.2 Kg | +3 Kg | 96.16% | | Rollwiderstand | 2nd | 9.9 kg / t | 9 kg / t | +0.9 kg / t | 90.91% | Beurteilungen lesen |
|
|
| Test | # | Result | Best | Difference | % |
|---|
| Trockenbremsen | 4th | 48.5 M | 46 M | +2.5 M | 94.85% | | Trockenhandling | 3rd | 102.32 s | 100.84 s | +1.48 s | 98.55% | | Subj. Trockenhandling | 3rd | 8 Points | 10 Points | -2 Points | 80% | | Nassbremsen | 4th | 65.7 M | 59.3 M | +6.4 M | 90.26% | | Nasshandling | 3rd | 85.9 s | 82.2 s | +3.7 s | 95.69% | | Subj. Nasshandling | 3rd | 8.5 Points | 10 Points | -1.5 Points | 85% | | Aquaplaning geradeaus | 4th | 86.1 Km/H | 105.1 Km/H | -19 Km/H | 81.92% | | Schotterhandling | 2nd | 61.12 s | 60.92 s | +0.2 s | 99.67% | | Subj. Schotter Handling | 2nd | 9.8 Points | 10 Points | -0.2 Points | 98% | | Schmutz Handling | 1st | 52.62 s | | | 100% | | Subj. Schmutz Handling | 1st | 10 Points | | | 100% | | Schlamm Performance | 2nd | 149 % | 199 % | -50 % | 74.87% | | Subj. Komfort | 3rd | 9 Points | 10 Points | -1 Points | 90% | | Reifengewicht | 2nd | 77.7 Kg | 75.2 Kg | +2.5 Kg | 96.78% | | Rollwiderstand | 3rd | 10.3 kg / t | 9 kg / t | +1.3 kg / t | 87.38% | Beurteilungen lesen |
|
|
| Test | # | Result | Best | Difference | % |
|---|
| Trockenbremsen | 3rd | 48.1 M | 46 M | +2.1 M | 95.63% | | Trockenhandling | 4th | 103.63 s | 100.84 s | +2.79 s | 97.31% | | Subj. Trockenhandling | 4th | 7.2 Points | 10 Points | -2.8 Points | 72% | | Nassbremsen | 3rd | 65 M | 59.3 M | +5.7 M | 91.23% | | Nasshandling | 4th | 86.6 s | 82.2 s | +4.4 s | 94.92% | | Subj. Nasshandling | 4th | 8 Points | 10 Points | -2 Points | 80% | | Aquaplaning geradeaus | 1st | 105.1 Km/H | | | 100% | | Schotterhandling | 1st | 60.92 s | | | 100% | | Subj. Schotter Handling | 1st | 10 Points | | | 100% | | Schmutz Handling | 4th | 54.14 s | 52.62 s | +1.52 s | 97.19% | | Subj. Schmutz Handling | 4th | 7.5 Points | 10 Points | -2.5 Points | 75% | | Schlamm Performance | 1st | 199 % | | | 100% | | Subj. Komfort | 4th | 8.5 Points | 10 Points | -1.5 Points | 85% | | Reifengewicht | 4th | 106.8 Kg | 75.2 Kg | +31.6 Kg | 70.41% | | Rollwiderstand | 4th | 11.5 kg / t | 9 kg / t | +2.5 kg / t | 78.26% | Beurteilungen lesen |
Beste UUHP-Reifen
Beste Ganzjahresreifen
Beste Winterreifen
